If you're not familiar with the concept, serverless services like AWS Lambda and DynamoDB On-Demand allow you to pay only for the resources you consume rather than maintaining always-on infrastructure.
This can be a game-changer for workloads with variable or unpredictable traffic, such as web servers, async workers, and even databases.
By shifting to a serverless model where appropriate, you can significantly reduce your overall spend and improve your application's scalability.
How do you determine if a service would be better run as serverless? Generally if the service is sporadically run then it is a good candidate for serverless. If it is constantly getting hammered with traffic or the few extra milliseconds it would take for a serverless service to boot up each time it is spun up would have a negative impact on your application then you probably want to go with an always on option.
What questions do you have about adopting serverless in your own environment?
Signup for our daily mailing list